Compare Post an RFQ

Robot sourcing for material handling

Map the transfer from pickup to placement, including any intermediate inspection or orientation step. Describe whether parts are separated, stacked or mixed. A handling shortlist must be reviewed with the actual gripping method and workspace.

Application-specific questions

Prepare the supplier comparison

Provide a layout, representative samples and the sequence of positions. Ask for a gripper proposal and a demonstration under the expected presentation conditions.

Define cell acceptance

Agree what will be demonstrated, how the cycle will be measured and which interfaces are included. Record the configuration used in the trial and the conditions that would require another review. Published robot specifications alone do not validate a complete application.

For system safety context, see the OSHA industrial robot system overview. Arrange an application assessment with a competent integrator; this procurement checklist is not a safety approval.

Buyer decision notes

Follow the workpiece from presentation to accepted placement

Material handling is a sequence of presentation, acquisition, transfer and placement. Define the incoming part condition and the acceptable contact surfaces before selecting a gripper or robot. Include any inspection or reorientation step, and distinguish moving an individual workpiece from transporting a pallet across a warehouse.

Prepared by · Analysis updated . Platform analysis, not an independent equipment test.

Compare proposals on the same basis

Ask each bidder to answer these items against the same drawings, parts and operating sequence. An unanswered item is a comparison gap, not a passed requirement.

Requested evidence and the gap it resolves
DecisionEvidence to requestAvoid this assumption
Incoming presentationDrawings or samples showing position, orientation, stacking and variation.One repeatable pickup point covers a mixed presentation.
Gripping constraintsPermitted contact, part mass and geometry, surface condition and the proposed pickup method.A gripper demonstration on one part covers all surfaces.
Transfer clearanceThe full tool and part envelope through obstructions and required orientation changes.Robot-centre reach proves carried-part clearance.
Placement resultLocation and orientation acceptance plus the response to a missed or dropped part.Reaching the destination means placement succeeded.

Separate fixed-cell handling from warehouse transport

A fixed arm proposal normally needs detailed pickup and placement poses. A warehouse vehicle proposal needs load-at-height, pallet and route information. Do not force both into one generic reach or payload comparison. Use the directory categories to identify which equipment is actually being discussed.

For the proposed gripper, ask what conditions can prevent a successful pickup and how those conditions are detected. Record which part variants have been demonstrated. The cell proposal should include where unsuccessful parts go and who is responsible for replenishment and recovery.

Worked sourcing brief

Illustrative procurement exercise. Assumptions below are invented for explanation; this is not a customer case, trial result or quotation.

Assume a transfer handles both dry and oily components with the same outer dimensions. A trial on dry parts does not cover the second presentation condition. Prepare separate sample sets and request accepted pickups and placements under the agreed conditions. If the task instead moves pallets to racks, switch to a warehouse brief rather than extending the arm comparison.

What to record before acceptance

Agree the test method, responsibilities and pass conditions before ordering. The items below are records to request, not a completed validation.

  1. Record each demonstrated part variant and its incoming presentation and surface condition.
  2. Measure accepted placement against the stated position and orientation criteria.
  3. Document the tool configuration and the agreed handling of unsuccessful picks or interrupted transfers.

Common buyer questions

Should gripping be selected after the robot?

Develop the concepts together. The tool and carried part affect load, access and process behaviour.

Does the same mass mean the same handling task?

No. Geometry, surfaces, orientation and presentation can create different tooling and layout requirements.

Continue the comparison

Sources and scope

The decision notes and procurement exercise are platform-authored. Supplier-specific numbers, where discussed, refer only to the published specifications on this page or the linked directory product pages. The following references provide background for the identified selection principles.

Background references explain their own equipment or general system principles. They do not certify, endorse or establish the capabilities of the suppliers in this directory. Missing project limits require a documented supplier or integrator response.

Share this page

Choose a service or copy the link to share.