Compare Post an RFQ

Manufacturer profile · QFB arms and coating integration

Luoyang Chege Robotics

Compare the published QFB arm envelopes, then resolve tooling, process integration and the evidence needed for a production cell.

01 / Company

What this company supplies

A robot application and arm supplier

Luoyang Chege Robotics develops industrial robot solutions and publishes the QFB range of flexible composite arms. Its company materials describe robot research and application work alongside coating, visual inspection, machine-loading and end-effector adaptation services. The current model pages distinguish the QFB140-12, QFB210-16 and QFB280-18 by their effective load, working radius, body mass and ordinary power consumption. These catalog statements are useful for a preliminary shortlist, but they do not establish a turnkey process result or a measured cycle time. The official company page presents commissioning and workshop imagery; no floor area, current capacity or independently inspected production line is asserted here. Buyers should ask who builds the arm, who integrates the complete cell and which party is responsible for local commissioning and safety documentation. Platform research has not included a factory visit or an equipment trial. Institutional search results have been located, but their full source pages were not readable during this review; their awards and project descriptions are therefore not treated as independently verified facts. [S1]

Keep arm and project scope distinct

The homepage lists coating, visual detection, machine loading, inspection and end-effector adaptation. A menu entry is evidence of advertised scope, not proof that every item is included with an arm purchase. Request a project responsibility matrix that names mechanical equipment, software, tooling, installation and local support. [S1]

02 / Products

A range with distinct purchasing tasks

QFB flexible composite arms

The three parameter-bearing model pages cover 12, 16 and 18 kg effective loads with 1,400, 2,100 and 2,800 mm working radii. QFB100-06 is named separately, but it is not included in this shortlist because its text did not expose a comparable parameter table. [S2]

Coating and contact-process discussions

The company describes coating and grinding related solutions. No booth certification, measured coating result or turnkey throughput is verified here. Bring the material, process and hazardous-area requirements to the first discussion. [S1]

Published in this directory

Compare the published QFB selection envelope [S2]

Manufacturer-published parameters · see linked product records for full scope
ItemPublished statementDetail to keep with it
QFB140-1212 kg / 1400 mmSupplier effective load / working radius; no loaded cycle time verified.
QFB210-1616 kg / 2100 mmSupplier effective load / working radius; no loaded cycle time verified.
QFB280-1818 kg / 2800 mmSupplier effective load / working radius; no loaded cycle time verified.

Repeatability is listed as ±0.05 mm on these three pages. Neither that value nor maximum radius establishes path accuracy, process quality or safe collaborative operation.

03 / Technical scope

Separate the arm envelope from process delivery

Integrated control and teaching

The QFB pages list an integrated controller and phone, tablet, API and JSON teaching interfaces. Buyers should identify exact software versions and agree on offline operation, access roles and backup recovery. [S2]

Interfaces are not a PLC integration contract

WiFi, Ethernet, Bluetooth and RS485 are named. Protocols, handshake diagrams, latency and fault handling are not provided in the captured model text. Obtain a tested interface definition for the chosen controller and plant PLC. [S2]

Force data needs its measurement scope

QFB210-16 and QFB280-18 list six-dimensional force range and accuracy. These data are not a safety contact-force limit and are not copied onto QFB140-12. Request calibration conditions and force-control implementation details. [S2]

04 / Quality

Certifications and quality

An independently reported institutional visit

A Henan provincial institutional report dated 17 July 2026 names Luoyang Chege Robotics among organizations visited during an innovation and entrepreneurship research visit in Luoyang on 16 July. This supplies external context for the company identity and local activity. It is not an assessment of robot performance, manufacturing capacity or safety certification, and it is not a factory visit conducted by this platform. [S3]

Company descriptions are not certificate verification

The company page states several technology-enterprise and innovation recognitions. Their current certificate numbers, validity and exact scope have not been verified. They are not displayed as certification badges. [S1]

Do not reinterpret C-T4

The arm pages use C-T4 as a protection statement. No independently verified ingress, explosion protection or system safety certificate is asserted. Obtain the original applicable documents before specifying a hazardous process. [S2]

Before ordering, ask the company to send the certificates and test reports that apply to your configuration. How these profiles are compiled.

05 / Project fit

Where to start the technical discussion

Typical projects matched to the supply scope above, with the first questions to settle for each.

A compact fixture discussion

Start QFB140-12 evaluation with station geometry and complete tooling load. Its shorter published radius may be sufficient if fixtures can be arranged around the base. This is procurement analysis, not a reported customer case. [S2]

A wider workstation discussion

Compare QFB210-16 and QFB280-18 using all process poses. The longer model adds 700 mm radius but only 2 kg effective load. Decide whether the extra reach solves a real layout constraint. [S2]

A coating-project discussion

Ask for the full arm, tool, coating supply, booth, ventilation, guarding and certification responsibility list. A supplier-advertised coating solution does not establish that the quoted arm alone delivers the complete process. [S1]

Turn the supply scope into a project handover

The documents and checks to agree with this company at each stage of delivery.

  1. Confirm the physical scope

    Freeze the chosen model, tool, accessories, base and fixture geometry, rather than purchasing from reach and load figures alone.

  2. Demonstrate the process

    Use representative parts and the complete tool. Agree on measurable process output and recovery behaviour before a trial.

  3. Receive the technical record

    Collect drawings, load review, risk assessment, safety documents, software backup and a country-specific service responsibility list.

06 / Next step

A clearer brief starts with these details

  • Exact model, process poses and loaded tool centre of gravity.
  • Required cycle time, process-quality measurements and acceptance method.
  • Controller version, PLC protocol, fault handling and restore procedure.
  • Hazardous-area classification, safety documentation and responsibility for the complete cell.
  • Installation location, service scope, consumables, warranty terms and spares.

The carry button temporarily keeps the edited questions in this browser tab for up to two minutes, then consumes them in the matching form. Nothing is sent until you submit.

Your brief opens with this manufacturer selected. Submission is an inquiry, not an order.

Common buyer questions

Are the awards independently verified?

No current award or certificate status is asserted. Two project/award source pages could not be read. The separately read institutional visit report supports only the reported company visit, not an award or equipment certification.

Does collaborative mean no guarding is required?

No. The complete application needs a risk assessment addressing tooling, workpieces, trapping points and operating modes.

Why is QFB100-06 not in the comparison?

Its title is visible, but comparable textual parameters were unavailable. Model-code suffixes are not used to invent load or reach.

Sources

Sources and check dates

What each source covers and the date it was last checked.

After reading the official company and model publications, an institutional report published on 17 July 2026 was read in full. It names the company in a Luoyang research visit on 16 July. Two separate Science and Technology Bureau project/award pages remain unread because they timed out, so no award or certification is asserted.

  1. [S1]

    Chege official company and supply-scope pages

    Manufacturer publication · Read 2026-10-11

    Legal name, official English logo name, advertised robot and integration scope; certificate statements remain unverified.

  2. [S2]

    Chege QFB140-12, QFB210-16 and QFB280-18 model pages

    Manufacturer publication · Read 2026-10-11

    Published load, radius, repeatability, body mass, electrical and interface descriptions; no independently measured performance.

  3. [S3]

    Henan United Front Work Department: Luoyang innovation and entrepreneurship visit

    Institutional publication · Read 2026-10-11

    Report published 17 July 2026 names Luoyang Chege Robotics among organizations visited on 16 July. Confirms only the reported institutional visit, not product performance, certification or a platform factory audit.

Prepared by RobotLineup Editorial. Report a correction.

Back to top ↑

Share this page

Choose a service or copy the link to share.