Compare 
Sign inProduct decision guide · Robot finishing tools
LX-F3000-Z Axial Compliance Servo Polishing Tool
LX-F3000-Z is an axial-compliance servo polishing tool, not a complete robot cell. Evaluate contact force, surface access and mounting load together before planning a finishing trial.
Manufacturer data with selection guidance for buyers.
Manufacturer data
Published specifications
The LX-F3000-Z is a servo driven polishing tool with axial compliance for automated surface finishing. Its official specification table lists a 1 kW motor, 220 V supply, 0–11 mm floating stroke, 18–220 N floating force, 3.2 N·m torque and 11.5 kg tool mass. Abrasive dimensions are customized to the application. The tool is intended for integration into a compatible automation system; it is not a complete robot. Confirm mounting, abrasive selection and process conditions before ordering.
- Motor power
- 1 kW
- Motor voltage
- 220 V
- Floating stroke
- 0–11 mm
- Floating force
- 18–220 N
- Tool torque
- 3.2 N·m
- Tool mass
- 11.5 kg
Values and units are shown as the manufacturer publishes them. Confirm the fit for your complete cell with the manufacturer.
Define the finished surface, not just the tool power
The useful starting point is the material, incoming surface condition, required finish and accessible contact path. Specify whether the job is deburring, blending, grinding or polishing and what measurement determines an acceptable part. A motor power value does not define stock removal or finish quality.
This record describes the LX-F3000-Z tool. Robot, fixture, abrasive, controller integration, dust handling and guarding must be scoped separately. The recorded 11.5 kg is tool mass, not a robot payload rating; adapters and other wrist-mounted components add to the installed load.
Record scope: [S1]
Read force, travel and torque as different limits
| Published item / decision | How to use it | Limit to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| 18–220 N contact-force range | Ask how force is controlled and measured through the actual approach and part variation. | Range alone does not give tracking accuracy or overshoot. |
| 0–11 mm axial travel | Budget part and fixture variation plus approach allowance against available travel. | Axial compliance does not correct every lateral positioning error. |
| 1 kW / 220 V and 3.2 Nm | Confirm utility conditions, drive configuration and duty limitations. | Electrical power is not guaranteed abrasive removal rate. |
| Published speed value: 3000 | Request the unit and operating conditions from the current manual. | The reviewed table did not clearly state the unit; do not assume rpm. |
Record scope: [S1]
Map the complete finishing system
- Provide the robot wrist interface, permitted load/inertia information and the complete mounted tool mass and centre of gravity.
- Select the contact wheel or abrasive and fixture around part access; provide a controlled abrasive-change method.
- Define force setpoints, motion path, signal exchange and recovery after lost contact or tool overload.
- Scope debris collection, work-zone enclosure, operator access and electrical installation with the responsible integrator.
Compare finishing proposals on measurable evidence
| Published item / decision | How to use it | Limit to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Surface requirement | Material, incoming condition, finish measurement method and permitted edge change. | A photographed shiny surface is not a measured result. |
| Contact behavior | Force trace or agreed measurement at approach, steady contact and exit. | A nominal setpoint is not demonstrated force control. |
| Abrasive life | Part count, consumable state and finish checks through the agreed run. | A new-abrasive demo is not a sustained production test. |
| Thermal or shape damage | Inspection method for burning, gouging, dimensional change and over-rounded edges. | Motor rating does not rule out part damage. |
Write a finishing acceptance record
When the proposal or trial does not match the task
Use this checklist to agree checks with the responsible supplier or integrator. It is procurement guidance, not an instruction to bypass guards, interlocks or the equipment manual.
| Published item / decision | How to use it | Limit to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Contact varies across the part | Compare contact direction, fixture/part variation, force settings and remaining axial travel. | Compliance travel cannot correct every lateral geometry error. |
| Surface changes as the abrasive wears | Record abrasive state and incoming surface, then measure the same agreed inspection locations. | A fresh-abrasive trial does not establish sustained finish quality. |
| The speed command is unclear | Request the model manual’s unit, permitted range and drive/configuration conditions. | The reviewed 3000 value alone is not a confirmed rpm setting. |
Resolve the supplied configuration and drawing
The current parameter image labels the abrasive consumable as customized to the requirement. The product text discusses automatic consumable replacement as a customization request. Neither statement establishes which abrasive, replacement mechanism or controller is included in a quoted standard package: obtain a signed inclusion list.
Record scope: [S1]
What to send with an LX-F3000-Z inquiry
Your inputs · local calculation
Build the complete mounted-mass schedule
The recorded finishing tool contributes 11.5 kg. Add components once: exclude this fixed mass from your inputs. The result is robot-mounted mass, not a statement that the changer or robot permits this load.
Enter your project inputs to calculate. No inputs are uploaded or saved.
Formula: recorded component mass + additional tooling + adapters/other equipment + retained workpiece. No automatic rating pass/fail; moments, load centre, acceleration and model-specific conditions need review.
Compare competing proposals on the same basis
Ask each bidder to answer these items against the same drawings, parts and operating sequence. An unanswered item is a comparison gap, not a passed requirement.
| Decision | Documents to request | Check before ordering |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 kg tool mass | Mass and geometry of the tool, abrasive, adapter and services in the proposed robot loading arrangement. | An 11.5 kg host robot rating automatically accommodates the full assembly. |
| 0–11 mm floating stroke | The intended contact direction and usable travel under the proposed process conditions. | The mechanism compensates for 11 mm of arbitrary part error. |
| 18–220 N floating force | Supplier explanation of the selected configuration and a trial plan for the buyer’s surface requirement. | A force within this range guarantees a particular finish. |
| 1 kW / 220 V / 3.2 N·m | Electrical integration details, abrasive configuration and the meaning of the quoted torque. | These values specify a complete robot cell or an unstated spindle speed. |
Keep unknown process values outside the specification
The recorded table does not give a validated material-removal rate, achieved roughness, abrasive service life or cycle time for the buyer’s part. Abrasive dimensions are customised. Ask for those details in a process proposal rather than converting motor power or floating force into invented performance figures.
Establish the acceptance method before the sample trial. State the incoming surface variation and where measurements will be made after processing. Keep any proposed contact settings and abrasive details with the results so a successful sample is not separated from the conditions that produced it.
Worked sourcing brief
Worked example for planning a quotation.
Assume a robot carries the 11.5 kg tool plus a 1.5 kg adapter and abrasive package. The known arithmetic subtotal is 13 kg before other mounted items or process loading are considered. A host robot chosen only from the 11.5 kg tool figure would omit those items. Send the complete assembly to the integrator and request a loading and path review; the example does not nominate a suitable robot.
What to record before acceptance
Agree the test method, responsibilities and pass conditions before ordering. The items below are records to request, not a completed validation.
- Record the exact abrasive, mounting adapter, utility arrangement and host-robot proposal.
- Retain representative before/after samples and the agreed finish measurements.
- Ask for documented wear, abrasive replacement and interrupted-process procedures for the quoted system.
Buyer questions
Can I interpret the tool mass as polishing payload?
No. It describes the tool’s own mass. Host-robot loading and process forces require their own review.
Does the listed force range prove force-control accuracy?
No accuracy or control-performance figure is established by that range. Request the relevant configuration-specific information.
Make the next conversation useful
Your inquiry checklist
Use the model-specific questions above to prepare one consistent brief. The checked items are temporary notes on this page; they are not submitted or saved to an account.
The carry button temporarily keeps your outline in this browser tab for up to two minutes and consumes it on the matching form. Nothing is sent until you submit the form.
Add this product to a specification comparison →Sources and check dates
[S1] Langxin LX-F3000-Z parameter table and product record
Manufacturer product record · Source reviewed
Tool mass, force, axial travel, electrical and torque values; speed unit remains unconfirmed. Source address and capture are retained privately. Analysis updated separately; no new factory trial is claimed.
Background selection references
The decision notes and procurement exercise are platform-authored. Supplier-specific numbers, where discussed, refer only to the published specifications on this page or the linked directory product pages. The following references provide background for the identified selection principles.
- Universal Robots manual: Payload and centre of gravity — Manufacturer-specific example of combined payload and centre-of-gravity configuration. Read 2026-10-07.
- OSHA Technical Manual: Industrial robot systems — System boundaries, integration and application risk assessment; not a site-specific approval. Read 2026-10-07.
Background guides explain the equipment type in general. For this model, request current configuration documents, commercial scope and an application trial. How profiles are reviewed · Buyer questions