Compare 
Sign inManufacturer profile · Injection-molding take-out automation
Ningbo SHIP Intelligent Technology
宁波社普智能科技有限公司
A Ningbo supplier of injection-molding manipulators and supporting automation. Start with the machine, mold and handling task, then compare the documented arm configuration.
01 / Company
What this company supplies
A machine-centered automation range
SHIP describes a business combining development, production, sales and service of automation equipment. Its company page concentrates on injection-molding manipulators, from oblique-arm configurations to light, medium and full-servo traversing designs. Conveyors and peripheral equipment form part of the stated supply range. This is more specific than a general industrial-robot-arm offering: the central purchase is a manipulator integrated with a molding machine and its part-removal sequence. [S1]
Wider range, narrower reviewed catalog
The current website also separates injection-molding, stamping and lathe robot categories. That wider catalog is company context; this directory currently publishes two injection-molding models. It does not establish the parameters of every advertised series, a complete production line or a commissioned installation. Ask for the exact model, end-of-arm tooling and installation scope in the proposal rather than treating the company range as a single standard package. [S2]
02 / Products
A range with distinct purchasing tasks
Injection-molding manipulators
The company lists oblique-arm and traversing configurations, including full-servo versions. Choose the architecture around mold access, extraction path and the required handling operation, rather than machine tonnage alone. [S1]
Published in this directory
Two published configurations to distinguish [S4]
| Item | Published statement | Detail to keep with it |
|---|---|---|
| SVAI-850S | Single-arm configuration; stated 4 kg load | 850 mm vertical, 730 mm crosswise, 1,350 mm traverse; supplier-stated minimum extraction time 1.4 s. |
| SVAW-850S | Telescopic-arm configuration; stated 5 kg load | Same published travel figures; supplier-stated minimum extraction time 1.5 s. |
Both directory records state a 120–300-ton molding-machine range. That range does not prove mounting compatibility, mold clearance or a complete cycle time. Gripper mass, runners and the handled part must be accounted for in the proposed load case.
03 / Technical scope
From equipment design to an installation proposal
Machining
Precision machining is a named function on the homepage. We have not established equipment types, tolerances, production capacity or which parts are made internally. A component drawing and inspection requirement are more useful than an unsupported capacity claim. [S2]
Assembly
The homepage describes lean assembly. Ask how alignment, travel, pneumatic or electrical connections and the selected arm configuration are checked before dispatch. No model-specific factory acceptance record is published here. [S2]
04 / Quality
Certifications and quality
What the independent record supports
A historical Yuyao government proposed-support list contains the Chinese entity name 宁波社普智能科技有限公司. It corroborates a name in that historical list; it is not a current registration extract, factory audit, product test or certification. [S3]
What still needs a project document
No issuer-verified quality certificate, measured repeatability report or complete machine-integration acceptance record is established here. Request the proposed configuration drawings, inspection record and acceptance criteria, with document date and model scope. [S1]
Before ordering, ask the company to send the certificates and test reports that apply to your configuration. How these profiles are compiled.
05 / Project fit
Where to start the technical discussion
Typical projects matched to the supply scope above, with the first questions to settle for each.
Molded-part extraction
A useful brief includes machine and mold drawings, opening clearance, part and runner mass, gripper concept, extraction path and required downstream handoff. Compare the arm arrangements against those constraints before choosing a model. If a heavier gripper is needed to retain a large molded part, revise the whole installed-load schedule and pickup clearance together. Keep the requested part quality and complete-cell timing unchanged while bidders propose different tooling. This is a configuration review, not evidence that the larger-rated model will suit the mold. [S1]
Take-out plus downstream handling
If the project includes conveyors, placement or further handling, separate the manipulator from the peripheral scope. Identify who supplies guards, interfaces and fault recovery. The company range supports asking about these options, not assuming they are included. For a take-out plus conveyor project, specify the release orientation, hot-part support, accumulation behavior and reset sequence. A conveyor being in the company range does not assign interface ownership; capture that scope in a drawing and acceptance document. [S1]
Compare proposals on the same basis
| Decision | Documents to request | Check before ordering |
|---|---|---|
| Relevant catalog scope | A quotation identifying SVAI-850S, SVAW-850S or a separately documented proposed model. | Every series in the company introduction has been individually reviewed here. |
| Machine integration | Machine model, mounting, mold opening and the supplier’s proposed interface. | A machine-tonnage range proves an installation match. |
| Tooling responsibility | An itemised gripper, runner and part handling scope with mounting and load conditions. | The manipulator quotation necessarily includes a complete end-of-arm tool. |
| Delivery and support | Written lead time, installation, training, warranty and spare-part terms for the destination. | A company description proves a particular local service capability. |
Turn the supply scope into a project handover
The documents and checks to agree with this company at each stage of delivery.
Freeze the mechanical envelope
Send the press mounting face, tie-bar positions and mold-open envelope together. Ask SHIP to return a layout showing pickup, retreat, parked arm and release positions. A proposed longer stroke is useful only if that complete path fits the available space.
Define retained-part confirmation
Separate successful gripping from mold clearance and successful release. Agree which signals confirm each event, which party supplies the sensing, and what the press does after missing confirmation. Record the maximum tool/part combination on the drawing.
Allocate the downstream interfaces
For take-out plus a conveyor or fixture, assign the ready/busy/fault handshake and the responsible supplier at each handoff. Document safe stops, restart conditions, wiring responsibility and whether peripheral equipment is included in the quote.
Agree a production acceptance record
Use the buyer’s mold, representative molded parts and defined inspection criteria. State the run length, complete-cycle timing, allowed interventions, damage/reject definition and recovery demonstrations before arranging shipment.
06 / Next step
A clearer brief starts with these details
- Machine model, mold layout and opening clearance
- Part, runner and complete tooling mass
- Required strokes and handling path
- Interface, guarding and acceptance responsibilities
- Destination, training and spare-part requirements
The carry button temporarily keeps the edited questions in this browser tab for up to two minutes, then consumes them in the matching form. Nothing is sent until you submit.
Your brief opens with this manufacturer selected. Submission is an inquiry, not an order.
Common buyer questions
Is SHIP’s published robot range the same as the proposed package?
No. Its robot and peripheral categories describe a company range. The quotation must name the manipulator, controller, gripping tool, interfaces, guarding responsibilities and commissioning scope separately.
Which drawing should be reviewed before selecting SVAI or SVAW?
A mounted motion-envelope drawing for the actual press and mold. The two published models share headline travel values but differ in arm arrangement and stated load. A travel table alone cannot resolve parked clearance or a safe tool path.
Does the profile verify every SHIP product?
No. Only the products actually published below have corresponding directory records; a wider company range is contextual.
Has the platform audited SHIP’s factory?
No independent factory audit is established by the published profile. Any reviewed evidence must be assessed with its stated scope.
Related selection guides
Injection Molding Robot Selection: Payload and Stroke Are Different Checks
Compare two SHIP take-out robots with equal strokes but different load ratings and arm forms, then prepare the configuration questions a supplier must answer.